Community Development Journal Advance Access published online on July 10, 2008
Community Development Journal, doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn021
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Staging Maralinga and desiring community: (Or why there is no such thing as a ‘natural’ community)
Address for correspondence: Dr James Arvanitakis, Centre for Cultural Research, University of Western Sydney, Australia. Email: j.arvanitakis{at}uws.edu.au
Though the concept of community crosses all political divides – from the reactionary, progressive and radical – it is a notion that is rarely problematized. Rather, ‘community’ is seen as something natural that emerges organically, reflecting all the elements of oxygen: it is unseen, cannot be felt unless it disappears and said to be vital for our survival. This paper raises concerns about such an approach, arguing it can lead to exclusion and divisiveness. Building on the arguments of Brent (in The desire for community: illusion, confusion and paradox, Community Development Journal, 39, (3), 213–223, 2004), I argue that community can only be created through ‘reciprocated’ desire. Using a community development project as a case study – the stage production of ‘Maralinga’, a story of nuclear veterans exposed to fallout – I highlight how community building can fail and how desire for community can emerge from unexpected places.