Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on May 22, 2008
Community Development Journal 2008 43(3):329-340; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsn018
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/3/329    most recent
bsn018v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yen, N. T. K.
Right arrow Articles by Van Luong, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2008 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

This article appears in the following Community Development Journal issue: Special Issue: Participatory Approaches in Community Development: Transitions and Transformations [View the issue table of contents]

Participatory village and commune development planning (VDP/CDP) and its contribution to local community development in Vietnam

Ngo Thi Kim Yen and Pham Van Luong

Address for correspondence: Ngo Thi Kim Yen, Helvetas Office, 298F Kim Ma, PO Box 81, Hanoi, Vietnam. Tel: +84 48431750; fax: +84 48431744; Email: helvetas{at}hn.vnn.vn

Village development and commune development planning (VDP/CDP) encourages the participation of local people in analyzing their problems and opportunities, and finding out solutions. This method contributes to community development by improving capacity of local people and strengthening the roles of commune leaders; promoting local participation and ensuring transparency and equity among different community groups and contributing to efficient and effective use of resources in community development. To achieve sustainability of the approach, some agencies responsible for its introduction have considered integrating it into the governmental system. However, major challenges include complexity of the method, high costs (time and resources) and lack of skilled community facilitators. Experience shows that this method needs leadership that is dynamic and initiative taking at various levels. Lessons learned show that much can be achieved by simplifying the planning method, concentrating on capacity building measures and developing monitoring and financial mechanisms to help improvement of socioeconomic development planning, and thus community development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.