Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on August 19, 2009
Community Development Journal 2009 44(4):525-528; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
44/4/525    most recent
bsp045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lahusen, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2009 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Civil Societies and Social Movements. Potentials and Problems

Christian Lahusen

University of Siegen, Germany

email: lahusen@fb1.uni-siegen.de

Derrick Purdue (ed), Routledge, Abingdon, Oxford, UK, 2007, 256 pp, ISBN 978-0-415-39933-3, Hardback, £70 stg.

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

Civil society has become a widely-used concept that represents what is considered to be an indispensable element of a good society and polity. Indeed, civil societies are venerated for contributing to democratization and good governance, to active citizenship and community development, to social relations and societal integration. The success of this concept can be attributed also to its ability to embrace previously distinct research strands and debates, which focussed, e.g., on non-governmental, non-profit and/or voluntary organizations, on the Third Sector, on social movements and on social capital, amongst others. However, as a conceptual umbrella, it risks to lack empirical and analytic precision. Moreover, most debates on civil society tend to blur analytic and normative questions. In fact, civil society has not only been a scientific category for analyzing societies, but also a programmatic tool for policy-making.

The collective volume edited by Derrick Purdue contributes to a . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?