Skip Navigation



Community Development Journal Advance Access published online on April 7, 2009

Community Development Journal, doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ravensbergen, F.
Right arrow Articles by VanderPlaat, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2009 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Barriers to citizen participation: the missing voices of people living with low income

Frances Ravensbergen and Madine VanderPlaat

Address for correspondence: Madine VanderPlaat, Department of Sociology and Criminology, Graduate Women's Studies, and the Director, Atlantic Metropolis Centre Saint Mary's University, Halifax, Canada; email: madine.vanderplaat{at}SMU.ca

This article reflects the involvement of people living with low income in the discourse and decision-making on issues related to poverty. It reports on the process and outcomes of a 1-year project, developed by KAIROS1 aimed at identifying tools, strategies, and policies to increase the participation and engagement of people living in poverty in order to help reduce and eliminate poverty in Canada. It presents the reflections, analysis, and recommendations of 55 project participants from Charlottetown, Montreal, and Victoria – a large, a medium-sized, and a small city, respectively, in Canada. It highlights the use of learning circles as one approach to enhance citizen participation in policy development albeit with limitations of time, funding, and broad impact. It concludes by calling for: (i) an increase in local learning and action opportunities for people living in poverty; (ii) more supportive front-line interactions between governmental and non-governmental agencies and people living on low incomes; (iii) government policy initiatives to reduce poverty; and (iv) action to increase public understanding of poverty to reduce the stigmatization of, and discrimination against, people living in poverty.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.