Community Development Journal Advance Access published online on April 7, 2009
Community Development Journal, doi:10.1093/cdj/bsp013
Communities of citizens and ‘indicators’ of sustainability
Address for correspondence: Dr Andy Scerri, Global Cities Research Institute, Room 48.4.05, RMIT University, GPO Box 2476V, Melbourne, VIC, Australia 3001; email: andy.scerri{at}rmit.edu.au
Indicator-based projects have become central to community development initiatives. The quantitative basis of such projects means that achieving ‘sustainability’ can be reduced to a technical task – that of gathering data and ticking boxes. The size, scope, and sheer number of indicators mean that indicator sets are often unwieldy and resist effective implementation. This techno-scientific emphasis can mask possibilities for taking into account the structures of power and cultural–political assumptions that frame the use of indicators. Too often, locally available resources and conditions that might support sustainable practices or challenge the existing unsustainable practices are subsumed by ‘hard facts’. The necessity of citizen participation and active involvement do not necessarily figure in projects driven by quantitatively determined indicators. We elaborate an alternative, two-level process of community engagement that is explored in one case study example. At the first level, it involves community members as active participants. At the second level, it builds upon this process to more deeply involve people in learning about and negotiating over what constitutes knowledge about how best to practice sustainable community development.