Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on September 5, 2006
Community Development Journal 2008 43(1):24-36; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsl035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
43/1/24    most recent
bsl035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shaw, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2007 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Community development and the politics of community

Mae Shaw

Address for correspondence: Higher and Community Education, Moray House School of Education, The University of Edinburgh, Paterson's Land, Holyrood Road, Edinburgh, EH8 8AQ; email: Mae.Shaw{at}ed.ac.uk

In a context in which ‘community empowerment’ is virtually government policy, it is hardly surprising that there is almost no area of social policy that is immune from the community treatment. Of course, this is not new, despite the zeal with which each new initiative is ‘rolled out’. In fact, sometimes it seems that policy development needs to reinvent the wheel of community every decade or so. The question, therefore, is what this ideological recycling of community tells us: first, about the meaning of the term itself; second, about its contemporary significance within the wider politics of the state. This article argues that we need to draw on those historical and theoretical resources which help us to think our way through to the contemporary context. Only an active and engaged recognition of the politics of community will enable us to get to the root of the problematic yet promising nature of community development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
F. Squazzoni
Local economic development initiatives from the bottom-up: the role of community development corporations
Community Dev. J., October 1, 2009; 44(4): 500 - 514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Qualitative Social WorkHome page
D. Bottrell
Understanding 'Marginal' Perspectives: Towards a Social Theory of Resilience
Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2009; 8(3): 321 - 339.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
N. Gaynor
In-Active citizenship and the depoliticization of community development in Ireland
Community Dev. J., July 23, 2009; (2009) bsp038v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
F. Ravensbergen and M. VanderPlaat
Barriers to citizen participation: the missing voices of people living with low income
Community Dev. J., April 7, 2009; (2009) bsp014v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.