Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on September 4, 2007
Community Development Journal 2007 42(4):435-448; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm035
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/4/435    most recent
bsm035v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Abah, O. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2007 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Vignettes of Communities in Action: an exploration of participatory methodologies in promoting community development in Nigeria

Oga Steve Abah

Address for correspondence: email: ogaabah{at}yahoo.com

Three interconnected arguments are explored in this article. It begins by a reconsideration of community development, not from official and agency definitions but from what makes development real and satisfies not only physical needs, but also the spiritual as well as psychological. The second part looks at Theatre for Development (TFD) as a system of actualizing the participatory agenda so direly required, so often talked about and very consistently ignored in community development. I argue that TFD in its performative approach to discussing issues, forging alliances and community cohesion contributes to community development. In this instance, we witness TFD as a community art for instigating participation and change. I also talk about how in combination with other participatory methods, TFD can be empowering. This combination is what I call methodological conversation and the aesthetics that defines this conversation involves respect, dialogue, inclusion and flexibility. The case study section narrates the way in which this methodology has been applied in the turbulent environment of the Niger Delta in Nigeria. I argue that TFD, Participatory Learning and Action (PLA) and Questionnaire methods were the triumvirate of approaches that allowed us to understand issues and for communities to listen to us. The challenge remains how to define and develop an enduring relationship between researchers, community and government who may have the wherewithal for action.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
F. Ibanez-Carrasco and P. Riano-Alcala
Organizing community-based research knowledge between universities and communities: lessons learned
Community Dev. J., August 7, 2009; (2009) bsp041v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.