Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on July 12, 2005
Community Development Journal 2007 42(2):151-166; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi072
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
42/2/151    most recent
bsi072v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Campbell, D.
Right arrow Articles by Nyomba, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2005 All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxford.org

Starting where the people are: Lessons on community development from a remote Aboriginal Australian setting

Danielle Campbell, Paul Wunungmurra and Helen Nyomba

Address for correspondence: Dr Danielle Campbell, Warlayirti Artists Aboriginal Corporation, PMB 20 Balgo, Via Halls Creek, W.A. 6770, Australia. email: culture{at}balgoart.org.au

This paper analyses a government health department's attempt to implement a community development strategy in a remote Aboriginal Australian community after identifying deficiencies in one of its health programmes. The reluctance of non-Aboriginal departmental clinic staff to share control of health decisions with Aboriginal participants, together with the deeply embedded power inequalities, undermined the development process and the achievement of project objectives. After lengthy critical reflection and supported by the project team and other community agencies, a group of community members addressed the priority issue they identified with a community-owned strategy in opposition to health professionals. This study raises questions about the capacity of government departments to practise community development, particularly given the unequal power relations, and their reluctance to share power between such departments and marginalized, disadvantaged communities.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.