Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on April 25, 2006
Community Development Journal 2006 41(3):307-320; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsl010
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/3/307    most recent
bsl010v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by McBride, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Sherraden, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2006 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Limitations of civic service: critical perspectives

Amanda Moore McBride, Assistant Professor and Research Director

Center for Social Development, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University

Jenny Brav

Initially led the writing of this article. She is now serving in an international service program in Nepal

Natasha Menon, Assistant Professor

Graduate School of Social Service, Fordham University

Michael Sherraden, Professor and Director

Center for Social Development, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St. Louis

Address for correspondence: Amanda Moore McBride, Center for Social Development, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St Louis, MO 63130; email: ammcbride{at}wustl.edu

Community, national, and international service policies and programs exist worldwide. Anecdotally, their prevalence has increased dramatically in recent years. Their proliferation indicates a tacit presumption of their positive nature. While acknowledging the benefits of these programs, we call attention to the possible limitations of service, including elitism, state interests, and imperialism. We emphasize implications for policy, practice, and research.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
P. Smets and S. ten Kate
Let's Meet! Let's Exchange! LETS as an Instrument for Linking Asylum Seekers and the Host Community in the Netherlands
Journal of Refugee Studies, September 1, 2008; 21(3): 326 - 346.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Urban StudHome page
P. Smets and M. den Uyl
The Complex Role of Ethnicity in Urban Mixing: A Study of Two Deprived Neighbourhoods in Amsterdam
Urban Stud, June 1, 2008; 45(7): 1439 - 1460.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.