Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2005
Community Development Journal 2006 41(3):266-276; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi047
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/3/266    most recent
bsi047v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Laverack, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2005 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Evaluating community capacity: Visual representation and interpretation

Glenn Laverack, Director

Health Promotion, Department of Social and Community Health, University of Auckland, New Zealand

Address for correspondence: g.laverack{at}auckland.ac.nz

The purpose of this paper is to provide an interpretation of programme experiences in the visual representation of strategies used to build community capacity. The paper first discusses the definition of community capacity in a programme context and describes different approaches for the visual representation of the evaluation of community capacity. What is new about this paper is that it provides a discussion about the interpretation of community capacity and in particular the use of the spider web configuration (so called because of the shape it resembles). This is illustrated by three examples taken from two different community development programmes, the first of which is in Fiji and the second in Kyrgyzstan. The paper concludes with a discussion about the implications for the community development practice of using visual representations of community capacity, including the difficulties, for example, of mapping changes in community capacities over time, and the benefits, for example, of promoting a free flow of information between stakeholders. The paper will assist practitioners to better plan for, evaluate and visually represent the findings of strategies used to build community capacity in community development programmes.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.