Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2005
Community Development Journal 2006 41(1):75-88; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi043
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
41/1/75    most recent
bsi043v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kotval, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2005 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

The link between community development practice and theory: intuitive or irrelevant? A case study of New Britain, Connecticut

Zenia Kotval, Associate Professor of Urban and Regional Planning, and Director of Urban Planning Partnerships

Michigan State University, USA

Address for correspondence: kotval{at}msu.edu

In planning practice it is common to argue, discuss and bargain before creating a plan that most stakeholders can endorse. But what happens when the distrust between civic leaders and residents is so intense that there can be no common ground? Does planning theory intuitively guide our practice or does the gap between theory and practice make the former irrelevant to community development and planning professionals? Within the context of planning theories and principles, this paper offers a description of the setting, the planning concerns, and the process and evaluates a consultant planning firm's actions with respect to the revitalization of the Broad Street Business District in New Britain, Connecticut. It concludes with lessons for other planners and community development professionals involved in planning projects that take place in a climate of hostility and value conflicts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.