Skip Navigation


Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on February 25, 2005
Community Development Journal 2005 40(3):286-300; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi037
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
40/3/286    most recent
bsi037v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fraser, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2005 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org

Four different approaches to community participation

Heather Fraser, Assistant Professor

Faculty of Social Work, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada. This paper was first conceived while she was working as a Senior Lecturer at RMIT University, Melbourne, and doing a consultancy on community facilitation with the Glenelg Hopkins Catchment Management Authority, Hamilton, Victoria, Australia

Address for correspondence: heather.fraser{at}rmit.edu.au

This paper explores some of the politics of community work by examining four basic community participation approaches. Moving from the right of politics to the left, it overviews some of the different theoretical orientations, goals, processes and recruitment practices that are commonly used but not always recognized to constitute different forms of community participation. Offered primarily to ‘lay’ community members, students and beginning practitioners, the paper is intended to clarify some of the differences that emerge when participation projects are designed, and to stimulate discussion about community participation more generally.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Journal of Social WorkHome page
H. Fraser
Trying to Complete Socially Just, Politically Sensitive Social Work Research
Journal of Social Work, January 1, 2009; 9(1): 87 - 98.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
F. Verity and S. King
Responding to intercommunal conflict - what can restorative justice offer?
Community Dev. J., October 1, 2008; 43(4): 470 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
L. Kane
The World Bank, community development and education for social justice
Community Dev. J., April 1, 2008; 43(2): 194 - 209.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
D. Clover
Feminist aesthetic practice of community development: the case of Myths and Mirrors Community Arts
Community Dev. J., October 1, 2007; 42(4): 512 - 522.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J Health PsycholHome page
A. De-Graft Aikins and D. F. Marks
Health, Disease and Healthcare in Africa
J Health Psychol, May 1, 2007; 12(3): 387 - 402.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.