Community Development Journal Advance Access originally published online on January 31, 2005
Community Development Journal 2005 40(3):265-274; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi017
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Labour's appropriation of the concept of community: a critique
Address for correspondence: Faculty of Continuing Education, Birkbeck College, 26 Russell Square, London WC1B 5DQ. Tel: 020 7631 6318; email: i.fremeaux{at}bbk.ac.uk
This article analyses the ways in which community, one of the most important yet ill-defined concepts in Social Sciences, has been appropriated in the discourse of the UK's New Labour government. It argues that the highly strategic ways in which the term is used leads to associated meanings that neglect the intrinsically complex nature of the concept and risk essentializing group identities, thus adversely affecting the most deprived sections of society.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Cockfield, A. Rainnie, D. Buttigieg, and M. Jerrard Community Unionism and Union Renewal: Building Linkages between Unions and Community in Victoria, Australia Labor Studies Journal, December 1, 2009; 34(4): 461 - 484. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. MacLeavy (Re)Analysing Community Empowerment: Rationalities and Technologies of Government in Bristol's New Deal for Communities Urban Stud, April 1, 2009; 46(4): 849 - 875. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. DeFilippis, R. Fisher, and E. Shragge What's left in the community? Oppositional politics in contemporary practice Community Dev. J., January 1, 2009; 44(1): 38 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Murray and B. Poland Health Psychology and Social Action J Health Psychol, May 1, 2006; 11(3): 379 - 384. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||



