Skip Navigation

Community Development Journal 2005 40(2):169-181; doi:10.1093/cdj/bsi025
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zetter, R.
Right arrow Articles by Sigona, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© Oxford University Press and Community Development Journal. 2005 All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions{at}oupjournals.org

Theoretical Perspectives

Social capital or social exclusion? The impact of asylum-seeker dispersal on UK refugee community organizations

Roger Zetter, Professor, Director*, David Griffiths, Dr, Senior Researcher and Nando Sigona, Ph.D. student

Development and Forced Migration Research Unit, Oxford Brookes University

* Address for correspondence: School of Built Environment, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, OX3 0BP. Email: rwzetter{at}brookes.ac.uk

Based on UK fieldwork in the West Midlands, Manchester and Liverpool and London, the paper explores the impacts of asylum-seeker dispersal on the formation of refugee community organizations (RCOs). An outline of policy precedes discussion which demonstrates how dispersal has consolidated a solid core of established RCOs in London, whilst stimulating a regional periphery of volatile semi-secure and insecure RCOs competing for shrinking financial support. The main part of the paper challenges the prevailing paradigm of RCOs as formally constituted organizations of social capital which crucially mediate the process of integration. This traditional role and rationale has been sacrificed for largely short-term, defensive tasks in a hostile policy environment. Despite their proliferation, RCOs resist institutionalization within both the state apparatus and their community networks.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
COMMUNITY DEV JHome page
C. Daley
Exploring community connections: community cohesion and refugee integration at a local level
Community Dev. J., April 1, 2009; 44(2): 158 - 171.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Refugee StudiesHome page
R. Zetter
More Labels, Fewer Refugees: Remaking the Refugee Label in an Era of Globalization
Journal of Refugee Studies, June 1, 2007; 20(2): 172 - 192.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.