Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, M.
Right arrow Articles by Stephens, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Community Development Journal 36:273-288 (2001)
© 2001 Community Development Journal and Oxford University Press


Article

The changing role of the state in participatory development: from the reconstruction and development programme to growth, employment and redistribution

Michal Lyons, Carin Smuts and Anthea Stephens

The Faculty of Built Environment, South Bank University, UK. lyonsm{at}sbu.ac.uk
CS Studio Architects, Cape Town, South Africa

The increasing strength of representative democracy in South Africa has profoundly changed the nature of the participatory process in urban development. Building on a wide range of sources, we analyze the changing policy framework in South Africa, and assess its impact on small- to medium-sized development projects in Cape Town, Johannesburg and Durban. We then analyze the relationship between the changing role of national government and the nature of participation, in particular, its impacts on institutional change at a local and national level. Findings are theorized in terms of the international debates on urban governance and participatory development.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Socioecon RevHome page
L. Baccaro and K. Papadakis
The downside of participatory-deliberative public administration
Socioecon. Rev., April 1, 2009; 7(2): 245 - 276.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.